what protocol is used to upload and download files

Standard protocol for transferring files over TCP/IP networks

File Transfer Protocol
Advice protocol
Purpose File transfer
Developer(s) Abhay Bhushan for RFC 959
Introduction April 16, 1971; 50 years ago  (1971-04-16)
OSI layer Awarding layer
Port(s) 21 for control, 20 for data transfer
RFC(s) RFC 959

The File Transfer Protocol (FTP) is a standard advice protocol used for the transfer of computer files from a server to a client on a reckoner network. FTP is built on a client–server model architecture using separate command and data connections between the client and the server.[i] FTP users may authenticate themselves with a clear-text sign-in protocol, usually in the form of a username and password, merely can connect anonymously if the server is configured to allow information technology. For secure transmission that protects the username and countersign, and encrypts the content, FTP is oft secured with SSL/TLS (FTPS) or replaced with SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP).

The starting time FTP customer applications were control-line programs developed before operating systems had graphical user interfaces, and are still shipped with most Windows, Unix, and Linux operating systems.[two] [3] Many FTP clients and automation utilities take since been developed for desktops, servers, mobile devices, and hardware, and FTP has been incorporated into productivity applications, such as HTML editors.

In January 2021, support for the FTP protocol was disabled in Google Chrome 88,[4] and disabled in Firefox 88.0.[5] In July 2021, Firefox 90 dropped FTP entirely,[6] and Google followed suit in October 2021, removing FTP entirely in Google Chrome 95.[7]

History of FTP servers [edit]

The original specification for the File Transfer Protocol was written by Abhay Bhushan and published equally RFC 114 on 16 April 1971. Until 1980, FTP ran on NCP, the predecessor of TCP/IP.[2] The protocol was subsequently replaced past a TCP/IP version, RFC 765 (June 1980) and RFC 959 (October 1985), the current specification. Several proposed standards amend RFC 959, for example RFC 1579 (February 1994) enables Firewall-Friendly FTP (passive manner), RFC 2228 (June 1997) proposes security extensions, RFC 2428 (September 1998) adds support for IPv6 and defines a new type of passive way.[viii]

Protocol overview [edit]

Communication and data transfer [edit]

Illustration of starting a passive connexion using port 21

FTP may run in active or passive mode, which determines how the information connexion is established.[9] (This sense of "mode" is unlike from that of the Style command in the FTP protocol, and corresponds to the PORT/PASV/EPSV/etc commands instead.) In both cases, the client creates a TCP control connectedness from a random, commonly an unprivileged, port N to the FTP server command port 21.

  • In active manner, the customer starts listening for incoming data connections from the server on port M. Information technology sends the FTP command PORT M to inform the server on which port information technology is listening. The server then initiates a information channel to the client from its port twenty, the FTP server data port.
  • In situations where the client is behind a firewall and unable to accept incoming TCP connections, passive fashion may exist used. In this mode, the client uses the control connectedness to transport a PASV control to the server and then receives a server IP address and server port number from the server,[9] which the client then uses to open a data connection from an capricious client port to the server IP accost and server port number received.[x]

Both modes were updated in September 1998 to support IPv6. Further changes were introduced to the passive manner at that time, updating it to extended passive mode.[11]

The server responds over the control connection with three-digit status codes in ASCII with an optional text message. For case, "200" (or "200 OK") means that the concluding command was successful. The numbers represent the code for the response and the optional text represents a human-readable explanation or asking (due east.g. <Need account for storing file>).[i] An ongoing transfer of file data over the information connection tin can exist aborted using an interrupt message sent over the control connectedness.

FTP needs two ports (one for sending and ane for receiving) because it was originally designed to operate on Network Control Program (NCP), which was a simplex protocol that utilized 2 port addresses, establishing two connections, for two-mode communications. An odd and an even port were reserved for each awarding layer awarding or protocol. The standardization of TCP and UDP reduced the need for the use of two simplex ports for each application down to one duplex port,[12] : xv but the FTP protocol was never contradistinct to simply use one port, and continued using two for backwards compatibility.

NAT and firewall traversal [edit]

FTP normally transfers data by having the server connect back to the customer, afterward the PORT command is sent past the client. This is problematic for both NATs and firewalls, which exercise non allow connections from the Internet towards internal hosts.[xiii] For NATs, an additional complication is that the representation of the IP addresses and port number in the PORT command refer to the internal host'southward IP accost and port, rather than the public IP address and port of the NAT.

There are 2 approaches to solve this problem. One is that the FTP client and FTP server apply the PASV command, which causes the data connection to be established from the FTP client to the server.[13] This is widely used by modern FTP clients. Another approach is for the NAT to alter the values of the PORT command, using an application-level gateway for this purpose.[13]

Data types [edit]

While transferring information over the network, iv information types are divers:[ii] [iii] [8]

  • ASCII (TYPE A): Used for text. Data is converted, if needed, from the sending host's character representation to "8-bit ASCII" before transmission, and (over again, if necessary) to the receiving host's character representation. Equally a consequence, this mode is inappropriate for files that contain data other than plain text.
  • Paradigm (Blazon I, ordinarily called Binary style): The sending machine sends each file byte by byte, and the recipient stores the bytestream as it receives information technology. (Prototype fashion support has been recommended for all implementations of FTP).
  • EBCDIC (Blazon E): Used for plainly text betwixt hosts using the EBCDIC character set.
  • Local (Blazon L n): Designed to support file transfer betwixt machines which do not use 8-bit bytes, east.m. 36-bit systems such as December PDP-10s. For example, "TYPE L nine" would be used to transfer data in ix-scrap bytes, or "Blazon L 36" to transfer 36-chip words. Most contemporary FTP clients/servers only back up 50 8, which is equivalent to I.

An expired Internet Draft divers a TYPE U for transferring Unicode text files using UTF-eight;[xiv] although the typhoon never became an RFC, it has been implemented by several FTP clients/servers.

Annotation these information types are normally chosen "modes", although ambiguously that word is also used to refer to active-vs-passive advice mode (see in a higher place), and the modes gear up by the FTP protocol MODE control (see beneath).

For text files (TYPE A and TYPE E), 3 different format control options are provided, to control how the file would be printed:

  • Non-print (TYPE A North and TYPE E N) – the file does non incorporate any carriage control characters intended for a printer
  • Telnet (TYPE A T and TYPE E T) – the file contains Telnet (or in other words, ASCII C0) carriage control characters (CR, LF, etc)
  • ASA (TYPE A A and TYPE East A) – the file contains ASA carriage command characters

These formats were mainly relevant to line printers; most contemporary FTP clients/servers only support the default format control of N.

File structures [edit]

File organization is specified using the STRU command. The following file structures are defined in section 3.1.1 of RFC959:

  • F or FILE structure (stream-oriented). Files are viewed as an arbitrary sequence of bytes, characters or words. This is the usual file structure on Unix systems and other systems such every bit CP/Thou, MS-DOS and Microsoft Windows. (Section 3.i.one.1)
  • R or Tape structure (record-oriented). Files are viewed as divided into records, which may be fixed or variable length. This file arrangement is common on mainframe and midrange systems, such as MVS, VM/CMS, OS/400 and VMS, which support record-oriented filesystems.
  • P or Folio structure (page-oriented). Files are divided into pages, which may either contain information or metadata; each page may besides have a header giving various attributes. This file structure was specifically designed for TENEX systems, and is generally non supported on other platforms. RFC1123 department 4.1.2.3 recommends that this structure not be implemented.

Near gimmicky FTP clients and servers only back up STRU F. STRU R is however in use in mainframe and minicomputer file transfer applications.

Data transfer modes [edit]

Data transfer can exist done in any of 3 modes:[1] [2]

  • Stream fashion (Mode South): Data is sent every bit a continuous stream, relieving FTP from doing any processing. Rather, all processing is left up to TCP. No Terminate-of-file indicator is needed, unless the data is divided into records.
  • Cake mode (MODE B): Designed primarily for transferring tape-oriented files (STRU R), although can also be used to transfer stream-oriented (STRU F) text files. FTP puts each tape (or line) of data into several blocks (cake header, byte count, and data field) and and so passes information technology on to TCP.[8]
  • Compressed fashion (MODE C): Extends MODE B with data compression using run-length encoding.

Most contemporary FTP clients and servers do not implement MODE B or MODE C; FTP clients and servers for mainframe and minicomputer operating systems are the exception to that.

Some FTP software besides implements a DEFLATE-based compressed style, sometimes chosen "Mode Z" afterward the command that enables it. This fashion was described in an Internet Draft, but not standardized.[15]

GridFTP defines additional modes, Way E[16] and Mode Ten,[17] equally extensions of MODE B.

Boosted commands [edit]

More recent implementations of FTP support the Modify Fact: Modification Fourth dimension (MFMT) command, which allows a client to arrange that file aspect remotely, enabling the preservation of that attribute when uploading files.[eighteen] [xix]

To retrieve a remote file timestamp, there's MDTM command. Some servers (and clients) support nonstandard syntax of the MDTM command with two arguments, that works the same way equally MFMT [20]

Login [edit]

FTP login uses normal username and password scheme for granting access.[ii] The username is sent to the server using the USER command, and the password is sent using the Pass command.[2] This sequence is unencrypted "on the wire", so may be vulnerable to a network sniffing assault.[21] If the information provided past the customer is accepted by the server, the server will transport a greeting to the client and the session will embark.[two] If the server supports it, users may log in without providing login credentials, merely the same server may authorize merely limited access for such sessions.[2]

Anonymous FTP [edit]

A host that provides an FTP service may provide bearding FTP access.[2] Users typically log into the service with an 'anonymous' (lower-instance and case-sensitive in some FTP servers) account when prompted for user name. Although users are commonly asked to send their email address instead of a countersign,[3] no verification is actually performed on the supplied information.[22] Many FTP hosts whose purpose is to provide software updates will allow anonymous logins.[3]

Differences from HTTP [edit]

HTTP essentially fixes the bugs in FTP that made it inconvenient to use for many modest ephemeral transfers as are typical in web pages.

FTP has a stateful control connection which maintains a current working directory and other flags, and each transfer requires a secondary connectedness through which the data are transferred. In "passive" manner this secondary connection is from client to server, whereas in the default "active" style this connection is from server to client. This apparent role reversal when in agile style, and random port numbers for all transfers, is why firewalls and NAT gateways have such a difficult time with FTP. HTTP is stateless and multiplexes control and information over a single connection from customer to server on well-known port numbers, which trivially passes through NAT gateways and is simple for firewalls to manage.

Setting upwardly an FTP control connection is quite boring due to the round-trip delays of sending all of the required commands and awaiting responses, so it is customary to bring up a control connexion and hold information technology open for multiple file transfers rather than drop and re-establish the session afresh each time. In contrast, HTTP originally dropped the connection later on each transfer because doing so was and so inexpensive. While HTTP has subsequently gained the power to reuse the TCP connection for multiple transfers, the conceptual model is still of independent requests rather than a session.

When FTP is transferring over the information connection, the control connectedness is idle. If the transfer takes also long, the firewall or NAT may decide that the control connexion is dead and end tracking it, effectively breaking the connection and confusing the download. The single HTTP connection is only idle betwixt requests and it is normal and expected for such connections to be dropped after a time-out.

Software support [edit]

Web browser [edit]

Most common web browsers tin can retrieve files hosted on FTP servers, although they may not support protocol extensions such equally FTPS.[3] [23] When an FTP—rather than an HTTP—URL is supplied, the accessible contents on the remote server are presented in a style that is similar to that used for other web content. FireFTP is an browser extension designed as a full-featured FTP customer, it could be run inside Firefox in the by, only it'southward now recommend working with Waterfox.

Google Chrome removed FTP support entirely in Chrome 88.[24] Every bit of 2019, Mozilla was discussing proposals, including only removing back up for old FTP implementations that are no longer in use to simplify their code.[25] [26] In Apr, 2021, Mozilla released Firefox 88.0 which disabled FTP support past default.[27] In July 2021, Firefox xc dropped FTP support entirely.[half-dozen]

Syntax [edit]

FTP URL syntax is described in RFC 1738, taking the form: ftp://[user[:password]@]host[:port]/url-path (the bracketed parts are optional).

For example, the URL ftp://public.ftp-servers.example.com/mydirectory/myfile.txt represents the file myfile.txt from the directory mydirectory on the server public.ftp-servers.example.com as an FTP resource. The URL ftp://user001:secretpassword@private.ftp-servers.instance.com/mydirectory/myfile.txt adds a specification of the username and countersign that must be used to admission this resources.

More details on specifying a username and password may be plant in the browsers' documentation (east.g., Firefox[28] and Cyberspace Explorer[29]). By default, almost web browsers use passive (PASV) mode, which more easily traverses stop-user firewalls.

Some variation has existed in how unlike browsers treat path resolution in cases where there is a not-root home directory for a user.[thirty]

Download manager [edit]

Virtually mutual download managers can receive files hosted on FTP servers, while some of them also give the interface to retrieve the files hosted on FTP servers. DownloadStudio and Internet Download Accelerator allows non just download a file from FTP server only too view the list of files on a FTP server.[31] [32]

Security [edit]

FTP was not designed to be a secure protocol, and has many security weaknesses.[33] In May 1999, the authors of RFC 2577 listed a vulnerability to the following problems:

  • Brute-force attack
  • FTP bounce set on
  • Bundle capture
  • Port stealing (guessing the adjacent open port and usurping a legitimate connection)
  • Spoofing attack
  • Username enumeration
  • DoS or DDoS

FTP does not encrypt its traffic; all transmissions are in clear text, and usernames, passwords, commands and data tin can exist read by anyone able to perform parcel capture (sniffing) on the network.[2] [33] This problem is mutual to many of the Cyberspace Protocol specifications (such as SMTP, Telnet, POP and IMAP) that were designed prior to the creation of encryption mechanisms such as TLS or SSL.[8]

Common solutions to this problem include:

  1. Using the secure versions of the insecure protocols, east.g., FTPS instead of FTP and TelnetS instead of Telnet.
  2. Using a different, more secure protocol that tin can handle the task, east.grand. SSH File Transfer Protocol or Secure Copy Protocol.
  3. Using a secure tunnel such as Secure Shell (SSH) or virtual private network (VPN).

FTP over SSH [edit]

FTP over SSH is the practice of tunneling a normal FTP session over a Secure Vanquish connection.[33] Considering FTP uses multiple TCP connections (unusual for a TCP/IP protocol that is still in use), it is specially difficult to tunnel over SSH. With many SSH clients, attempting to set upwardly a tunnel for the command channel (the initial client-to-server connection on port 21) will protect only that aqueduct; when information is transferred, the FTP software at either cease sets up new TCP connections (data channels) and thus have no confidentiality or integrity protection.

Otherwise, it is necessary for the SSH client software to have specific noesis of the FTP protocol, to monitor and rewrite FTP control channel letters and autonomously open new packet forwardings for FTP data channels. Software packages that support this mode include:

  • Tectia ConnectSecure (Win/Linux/Unix)[34] of SSH Communications Security'southward software suite

Derivatives [edit]

FTPS [edit]

Explicit FTPS is an extension to the FTP standard that allows clients to request FTP sessions to be encrypted. This is done by sending the "AUTH TLS" command. The server has the pick of assuasive or denying connections that do not request TLS. This protocol extension is defined in RFC 4217. Implicit FTPS is an outdated standard for FTP that required the use of a SSL or TLS connection. It was specified to utilize different ports than apparently FTP.

SSH File Transfer Protocol [edit]

The SSH file transfer protocol (chronologically the 2d of the 2 protocols abbreviated SFTP) transfers files and has a similar command set for users, but uses the Secure Shell protocol (SSH) to transfer files. Unlike FTP, it encrypts both commands and data, preventing passwords and sensitive information from being transmitted openly over the network. It cannot interoperate with FTP software.

Footling File Transfer Protocol [edit]

Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP) is a simple, lock-step FTP that allows a client to get a file from or put a file onto a remote host. One of its primary uses is in the early on stages of booting from a local area network, because TFTP is very uncomplicated to implement. TFTP lacks security and most of the advanced features offered by more robust file transfer protocols such as File Transfer Protocol. TFTP was first standardized in 1981 and the current specification for the protocol tin can be found in RFC 1350.

Simple File Transfer Protocol [edit]

Simple File Transfer Protocol (the commencement protocol abbreviated SFTP), as defined past RFC 913, was proposed as an (unsecured) file transfer protocol with a level of complexity intermediate between TFTP and FTP. It was never widely accepted on the Internet, and is now assigned Historic status by the IETF. It runs through port 115, and often receives the initialism of SFTP. It has a control set of 11 commands and support three types of information manual: ASCII, binary and continuous. For systems with a word size that is a multiple of 8 bits, the implementation of binary and continuous is the same. The protocol likewise supports login with user ID and countersign, hierarchical folders and file management (including rename, delete, upload, download, download with overwrite, and download with append).

FTP commands [edit]

FTP answer codes [edit]

Below is a summary of FTP reply codes that may be returned by an FTP server. These codes have been standardized in RFC 959 by the IETF. The reply code is a three-digit value. The first digit is used to indicate one of three possible outcomes — success, failure, or to indicate an mistake or incomplete respond:

  • 2yz – Success reply
  • 4yz or 5yz – Failure reply
  • 1yz or 3yz – Error or Incomplete respond

The second digit defines the kind of fault:

  • x0z – Syntax. These replies refer to syntax errors.
  • x1z – Information. Replies to requests for information.
  • x2z – Connections. Replies referring to the control and data connections.
  • x3z – Authentication and accounting. Replies for the login process and accounting procedures.
  • x4z – Non defined.
  • x5z – File system. These replies relay status codes from the server file system.

The third digit of the reply code is used to provide additional detail for each of the categories defined by the second digit.

See also [edit]

  • Comparing of FTP client software
  • Comparison of FTP server software packages
  • Comparison of file transfer protocols
  • Ringlet-loader – FTP/Due south loading/testing open-source software
  • File substitution Protocol (FXP)
  • File Service Protocol (FSP)
  • FTAM
  • FTPFS
  • List of FTP commands
  • List of FTP server return codes
  • Managed File Transfer
  • OBEX
  • Shared file access
  • TCP Wrapper

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c Forouzan, B.A. (2000). TCP/IP: Protocol Suite (1st ed.). New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Loma Publishing Company Limited.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Kozierok, Charles M. (2005). "The TCP/IP Guide v3.0". Tcpipguide.com.
  3. ^ a b c d e Dean, Tamara (2010). Network+ Guide to Networks. Delmar. pp. 168–171.
  4. ^ "Deprecations and removals in Chrome 87". Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  5. ^ "Firefox 88.0, Run across All New Features, Updates and Fixes". Retrieved 23 Apr 2021.
  6. ^ a b Vonau, Manuel (7 July 2021). "Firefox follows in Chrome'south footsteps and drops FTP support (APK Download)". Android Police . Retrieved 12 July 2021. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  7. ^ "Remove FTP support - Chrome Platform Status". www.chromestatus.com . Retrieved 2 September 2021.
  8. ^ a b c d Clark, M.P. (2003). Information Networks IP and the Internet (1st ed.). W Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  9. ^ a b "Agile FTP vs. Passive FTP, a Definitive Explanation". Slacksite.com.
  10. ^ RFC 959 (Standard) File Transfer Protocol (FTP). Postel, J. & Reynolds, J. (Oct 1985).
  11. ^ RFC 2428 (Proposed Standard) Extensions for IPv6, NAT, and Extended Passive Way. Allman, Thou. & Metz, C. & Ostermann, S. (September 1998).
  12. ^ Stevens, Due west. Richard (1994). TCP/IP Illustrated Volume I. Vol. 1. Reading, Massachusetts, Us: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. ISBN0-201-63346-ix.
  13. ^ a b c Gleason, Mike (2005). "The File Transfer Protocol and Your Firewall/NAT". Ncftp.com.
  14. ^ Klensin, John. FTP Blazon Extension for Internationalized Text. I-D draft-klensin-ftpext-typeu-00. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
  15. ^ Preston, J. (January 2005). Deflate transmission mode for FTP. IETF. I-D draft-preston-ftpext-deflate-03. Retrieved 27 Jan 2016.
  16. ^ Allcock, W. (April 2003). "GridFTP: Protocol Extensions to FTP for the Filigree" (PDF).
  17. ^ Mandrichenko, I. (4 May 2005). "GridFTP v2 Protocol Description" (PDF).
  18. ^ "MFMT FTP command". support.solarwinds.com. 11 Oct 2018.
  19. ^ "FTP Commands: DSIZ, MFCT, MFMT, AVBL, Pass, XPWD, XMKD | Serv-U". www.serv-u.com.
  20. ^ "MDTM FTP command". support.solarwinds.com. 11 October 2018.
  21. ^ Prince, Brian. "Should Organizations Retire FTP for Security?". Security Week. Security Calendar week. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
  22. ^ RFC 1635 (Informational) How to Employ Anonymous FTP. P. & Emtage, A. & Marine, A. (May 1994).
  23. ^ Matthews, J. (2005). Figurer Networking: Internet Protocols in Activity (1st ed.). Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  24. ^ Sneddon, Joey (26 Jan 2021). "Linux Release Roundup: GParted, Lightworks, Google Chrome + More". omgubuntu.co.uk . Retrieved 30 January 2021.
  25. ^ "1574475 - Remove FTP support".
  26. ^ "Deprecate FTP back up - Chrome Platform Condition".
  27. ^ "See what's new in Firefox: 88.0 Firefox Release". mozilla.org. xix April 2021. Retrieved 20 April 2021.
  28. ^ "Accessing FTP servers | How to | Firefox Help". Support.mozilla.com. 5 September 2012. Retrieved xvi January 2013.
  29. ^ "How to Enter FTP Site Password in Internet Explorer". Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved thirteen February 2020. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) Written for IE versions half dozen and earlier. Might work with newer versions.
  30. ^ Jukka "Yucca" Korpela (18 September 1997). "FTP URLs". "IT and communication" (jkorpela.fi). Retrieved 26 January 2020.
  31. ^ "DownloadStudio - Internet Download Director And Download Accelerator - Features". Conceiva. Retrieved xix Oct 2021.
  32. ^ "Internet Download Accelerator | Features". WestByte. Retrieved twenty October 2021.
  33. ^ a b c "Securing FTP using SSH". Nurdletech.com.
  34. ^ "Components of the Data Assurance Platform (section Tectia ConnectSecure)". ssh.com. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020.

Further reading [edit]

  • RFC 697 – CWD Control of FTP. July 1975.
  • RFC 959 – (Standard) File Transfer Protocol (FTP). J. Postel, J. Reynolds. October 1985.
  • RFC 1579 – (Informational) Firewall-Friendly FTP. February 1994.
  • RFC 1635 – (Advisory) How to Use Bearding FTP. May 1994.
  • RFC 1639 – FTP Operation Over Big Accost Records (FOOBAR). June 1994.
  • RFC 1738 – Uniform Resource Locators (URL). Dec 1994.
  • RFC 2228 – (Proposed Standard) FTP Security Extensions. Oct 1997.
  • RFC 2389 – (Proposed Standard) Feature negotiation mechanism for the File Transfer Protocol. August 1998.
  • RFC 2428 – (Proposed Standard) Extensions for IPv6, NAT, and Extended passive fashion. September 1998.
  • RFC 2577 – (Informational) FTP Security Considerations. May 1999.
  • RFC 2640 – (Proposed Standard) Internationalization of the File Transfer Protocol. July 1999.
  • RFC 3659 – (Proposed Standard) Extensions to FTP. P. Hethmon. March 2007.
  • RFC 5797 – (Proposed Standard) FTP Command and Extension Registry. March 2010.
  • RFC 7151 – (Proposed Standard) File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts. March 2014.
  • IANA FTP Commands and Extensions registry – The official registry of FTP Commands and Extensions

External links [edit]

  • Communication Networks/File Transfer Protocol at Wikibooks
  • FTP Server Online Tester Authentication, encryption, mode and connectivity.
  • Anonymous FTP Servers by Country Code TLD (2012): "Offbeat Internet - Public Access - FTP". www.jumpjet.info. 2012. Retrieved xvi Jan 2020.

bantadrathey.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Transfer_Protocol

0 Response to "what protocol is used to upload and download files"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel